First
Book- 'Unholy Night' by Seth Grahame Smith
Picked it up in Waterstons for
entertainment weekly's review 'Akin to fusing Game of Thrones with the Gospel
of St Luke' which is basically what the book is in a nutshell. The story
follows a thief in his quest for revenge and his encounter with Mary, Joseph
and their baby but essential is a fantasy retelling of the birth of Jesus and
his escape from King Herod and the Romans. It's pretty interesting as it takes
the traditional story of the 3 wise men and it expands it, the wise men are not
wise men but rather on-the-run convicts disguised as wise men. Miracles and
magic happen in equal measure and you are never really certain of the validity of
each event due to some very trippy epically written dream sequences. As a brief
warning the book is violent and well very Game of Thrones in places.
The
setting is interesting (if not historically accurate ) and historical
characters such as King Herod, the puppet king put in place by the Romans to
rule over the Jews during the rains of Julia Cesar and then after the civil war
Augustine Cesar.
Second
Book 'Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus by Ludwig Wittgenstein
I have no
idea why I'm doing this it is so hard to read and just so annoying as a result
of it also being so interesting.
Quote from
the introduction
'The whole
sense of the book might be summed up in the following words: what can be said
at all can be said clearly, and what we cannot talk about we must pass over in
silence'
thus the aim
of the book is to draw a limit to thought, or rather - not to thought ,but to
the expression of thoughts : for in order to be able to draw a limit to
thought, we should have to find both sides of the limit thinkable (i.e. we should
have to be able to think what cannot be thought ).
Do I understand
much of it ? no not really am I going to try to at the expense of sleep and
sanity YES. I will attempt to read a bit at a time over till I believe that I
understand it and then I shall blog about it and then hopefully Miss Price
shall tell me what it actually means.
Interesting
side note the book is written almost in bullet points which I think reflects
greatly on Wittgenstein's nature.
No comments:
Post a Comment